Saturday, November 23, 2013

Corporate Accountability - Combating Monsanto (#12)

Whatever your take is on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), I think it's safe to say that most of  Americans are FOR some type of disclosure or labeling of GMOs -  "Skepticism of Genetically Modified Foods".

While this poll may be informal, it still highlights the fact that people want to know what they are eating.  A few days ago in Mexico, they banned GMO corn from the country altogether citing "imminent harm" to their environment and native corn production.  Monsanto has an unsettling past of suing farms that have inadvertently been contaminated with Monsanto seeds by a gust of wind or cross-pollination.  They have been successful countless times in closing down small farms that don't have the financial means to take on these corporate giants in court.  

However, in my home state of Washington, the litigation tables have been turned on Monsanto financial contributors, Grocery Manufacturers of America (GMA).  They have recently been sued by Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson in the hopes to get some corporate accountability.  

Ferguson claims that GMA illegally obtained and spent over $7 million dollars to lobby for Monsanto while concealing the identity of its contributors, which include big junk food and GMO-heavy corporations like Pepsico, Coca-cola, and General Mills.  Ferguson claims the GMA is subverting the law of disclosure that states campaigns must identify the source of their funding.  With no transparency, how can citizens judge the agenda of corporate entities involved in combating legislation meant to inform the public.

This all started because Washington state created Initiative 522 which would "mandate the labeling of genetically modified organisms (GMOs)".  Big corporations have a vested interest in keeping their GMO use quiet, and the money being funneled into the "no labeling" campaign is astronomical.

Unfortunately, Initiative 522 did not pass and many say the almost $22 million dollars spent by the opposition may have been one of the main reasons.  Small grass-roots organizations cannot garner the public support and attention that glossy ads and millions can buy.  In the end, the rural areas of Washington just didn't support the labeling of GMOs, just like the California initiative of 2012.

Here is another article I ran across that talks about the engineering of junk food and what it does to your brain.  Scary stuff.   Why We Crave Junk Food.

                                                             Observation
The response to the Young Conservatives of Texas "game" was quite substantial and even gained celebrity support when America Ferrera showed up to the counter-response at the Towers on Wednesday.  

4 comments:

  1. Great post! In regards to your observation, I had no idea that America Ferrera showed up to the counter-response to the Young Conservatives, that is so great to hear. That whole thing was so absurd and it's good to know that so many people knew that it was wrong and were willing to stand up against it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Interesting post. It is so weird to actually think about what things are being put into the food that we eat. I also feel that many of us are unaware of how our foods are being produced. I feel that the companies/people who produce the food that we eat should take better measures in making sure that the food is healthy for its consumers. This kind of makes me wonder the heck I have been eating and if my food has been genetically modified.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The YCT issue was definitely popular. I found myself discussing it with my tattoo artist the other day while getting some work done.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think a lot of us can tend to ignore what it actually is we're putting in our bodies. It is interesting how we will trust whatever it is that stores are selling, and not question the harm it could do.

    ReplyDelete